films we just saw
-
- Undead Horde
- Posts: 425
- Joined: Sun Apr 02, 2006 7:01 pm
I love Kilptrick -- he's in two of my favourite guilty pleasure: David Goyer's Death Warrant and the mighty Under Siege 2:Dark Territory (which has a bevvy of happenin' heavies including Peter Green and Everett McGill). How can you *not* be a genre character actor with a name like Patrick Kilpatrick?
Re: IJATKOTCS (?!??!) -- just brace yourself. It starts dreadfully with the once-classic fade-from-the-Paramount-logo and goes south from there. Just so disheartening.
I think the more adult (and brilliant) Munichs are where his heart and his mind is/should be now. The Jones pictures are pictures by younger men and -- like dancing at a disco -- should probably stay that way.
Re: IJATKOTCS (?!??!) -- just brace yourself. It starts dreadfully with the once-classic fade-from-the-Paramount-logo and goes south from there. Just so disheartening.
I think the more adult (and brilliant) Munichs are where his heart and his mind is/should be now. The Jones pictures are pictures by younger men and -- like dancing at a disco -- should probably stay that way.
[i]"Would you like to take a closer look ?"[/i]
-
- Undead Horde
- Posts: 472
- Joined: Sun Feb 17, 2008 1:24 pm
I think AI is brill.
But have avoided Munich for no real good reason.
The last film I watched was Enchanted. The Hannah loved it because disney were mocking themselves, I didn't like it because it was boring. Sean Penn-alike Patrick Dempsey was more wooden than ten Keanu Reeves, Amy Adams' eye muscles must have been in such pain from forcing that wide eyed for so long, Susan Sarandon and that guy from X-Men mugs around on screen and don't do much else but at least they are having fun.
There were too many adult winks for the kids to enjoy, and too much kiddy gubbins for me (almost an adult) to enjoy.
Poor effort, but we knew that, didn't we?
But have avoided Munich for no real good reason.
The last film I watched was Enchanted. The Hannah loved it because disney were mocking themselves, I didn't like it because it was boring. Sean Penn-alike Patrick Dempsey was more wooden than ten Keanu Reeves, Amy Adams' eye muscles must have been in such pain from forcing that wide eyed for so long, Susan Sarandon and that guy from X-Men mugs around on screen and don't do much else but at least they are having fun.
There were too many adult winks for the kids to enjoy, and too much kiddy gubbins for me (almost an adult) to enjoy.
Poor effort, but we knew that, didn't we?
Beauty is in the eye of the tiger.
-
- Undead Horde
- Posts: 491
- Joined: Fri Apr 07, 2006 6:27 pm
- Location: Addlestone, Surrey
I loved Enchanted and would like to marry a Disney princess when I am older.dangerous_jamie wrote:I think AI is brill.
But have avoided Munich for no real good reason.
The last film I watched was Enchanted. The Hannah loved it because disney were mocking themselves, I didn't like it because it was boring. Sean Penn-alike Patrick Dempsey was more wooden than ten Keanu Reeves, Amy Adams' eye muscles must have been in such pain from forcing that wide eyed for so long, Susan Sarandon and that guy from X-Men mugs around on screen and don't do much else but at least they are having fun.
There were too many adult winks for the kids to enjoy, and too much kiddy gubbins for me (almost an adult) to enjoy.
Poor effort, but we knew that, didn't we?
So to conclude; peasants like Dangerous Jamie should know their place
-
- Undead Horde
- Posts: 472
- Joined: Sun Feb 17, 2008 1:24 pm
-
- Frightfest Hardcore
- Posts: 1689
- Joined: Sun Jul 29, 2007 6:01 pm
- Location: Lincolnshire
- Contact:
i passed up my freebie screening to see gone baby gone,just couldnt face an hours drive in crap weather,so consoled the miserable weather with Death Proof,the extended cut,this is much better than the shortened version,still lots of talking,but we see more to stunt man mike,more of the sheriff and the infamous lap dance,QT should have left that in and took out more of the dialogue,then the GH version wouldnt drag so much.im starting to warm to it.
its not the smack you in face style film of reservoir dogs,or the bottom numbing jackie brown,or like pulp fiction, but im warming to it the more i see it,i might even be tempted to watch kill bill all over again as long as i can find a japanese version.
QT still has a foot festish though.
its not the smack you in face style film of reservoir dogs,or the bottom numbing jackie brown,or like pulp fiction, but im warming to it the more i see it,i might even be tempted to watch kill bill all over again as long as i can find a japanese version.
QT still has a foot festish though.
"Time To Nut Up Or Shut Up"
-
- Undead Horde
- Posts: 425
- Joined: Sun Apr 02, 2006 7:01 pm
What, what?! The Japanese version is a must (available from yesasia I think, at least thats where I got my copy from) but I'm intrigued to know why you'd need to be tempted to watch it again...Grindhouse wrote:...i might even be tempted to watch kill bill all over again....
Strange double bill last of Asylum (great!) and....Distant Voices, Still Lives: this second one may be the antithesis of a Frightfest film, but since there are a great many all-round cinephiles on these forums, I'd suggest anyone even vague;y interested in British cinema should lap this up as soon as possible. Simply beautiful.
[i]"Would you like to take a closer look ?"[/i]
-
- Frightfest Hardcore
- Posts: 1560
- Joined: Sun Mar 27, 2005 5:54 pm
- Location: A hell of my own making
- Contact:
More from the legendary, and possibly mad, Jess Franco. Some have been wonderful (She Killed In Ecstasy), and some have been pants (Nightmares Come At Night). Jack The Ripper unfortunately tends towards the latter. Mad Klaus Kinski stars as the mad doctor, hacking up the ladies of the Whitechapel night for reasons I didn't catch. It's incredibly illogical, nonsensical, but occasionally censor-baiting in its killing of naked girls - The Ripper has the habit of slicing off his victim's breasts (though it actually looks like he's providing cherry blancmanges frrom the cake shop). I've no idea whether that bizarre criminological titbit is consistent with his actual M.O., but since the ending veers wildly away from what little I know of Ripper history, I'm guessing it was just put in there to annoy censors. (The BBFC let it through, though.) A few laughs at the stupidity of it all.
http://streetrw.blogspot.com - For all your occasional film rambling needs.
http://twitter.com/streetrw - For when you really need to know what I had for breakfast.
AND NOW: SKYPE!
http://twitter.com/streetrw - For when you really need to know what I had for breakfast.
AND NOW: SKYPE!
-
- Frightfest Hardcore
- Posts: 1689
- Joined: Sun Jul 29, 2007 6:01 pm
- Location: Lincolnshire
- Contact:
well Giles after seeing the uk version of Kill Bill vol1, i didnt like it, then learning that the B&W yakuza battle scenes are in colour,a few years back,im just tempted to go back and watch both parts once i have the respective jap versions,if shogun assasin can be in colour with all the blood spurting, limb hacking in your face colour then so should Kill Bill,even The Challenge with Scott Glenn has samurai sword head splitting action in colour,and thats a top film,& needs releasing on dvd now!giles edwards wrote:What, what?! The Japanese version is a must (available from yesasia I think, at least thats where I got my copy from) but I'm intrigued to know why you'd need to be tempted to watch it again...Grindhouse wrote:...i might even be tempted to watch kill bill all over again....
Strange double bill last of Asylum (great!) and....Distant Voices, Still Lives: this second one may be the antithesis of a Frightfest film, but since there are a great many all-round cinephiles on these forums, I'd suggest anyone even vague;y interested in British cinema should lap this up as soon as possible. Simply beautiful.
"Time To Nut Up Or Shut Up"
- sherbetbizarre
- Frightfest Hardcore
- Posts: 1459
- Joined: Sun Aug 12, 2007 11:41 am
- Contact:
-
- Frightfest Hardcore
- Posts: 1689
- Joined: Sun Jul 29, 2007 6:01 pm
- Location: Lincolnshire
- Contact:
Indiana jones & the kingdom of the crystal skull.
I had quite low expectations of this film,so let me get this out of the way,its not all bad and its quite fun in places,but and its a big But,this is what happens when you put two guys together who can both direct and produce,at the helm of a sequel,that its a case of damned if you do! damned if you dont,come up with the goods so to speak.
So lets be honest they are not breaking new ground,other films have tapped the vein of indy too much,with all thats gone before,this film really is two guys playing safe,making a movie that they know is going to make money,but also they must have known it was underpar compared to the others that have been previous.
its lost its sparkle somewhere,the quick fire sense of humour is missing,the worthy adversary has gone,the fight scenes with the evil baddies dont seem so evil.
it has it winks & nods to the past films,but has none of the risktaking that those films had,even with the last crusade,there was a sense of fun with tongue in cheek,with raiders and temple of doom it was saturday morning adventure serial time,which is its appeal to young and old alike.
but with the thrills of raiders and temple there was a dark side, the horror side coming through thats done in a way to scare rather than shock, that was missing in IJ&KOTCS.
They could have done a nod to the naked jungle and had the ants devour the soldiers,stripping them clean before our eyes,and the ending wasnt quite as spectacular as it could have been.
if this is a childs first experience of indy with their parents,then they wont really think anything more of it,compared to all the effects laden films in the 9-10 years since the last crusade,but if its some one in their 30s or older who grew up with indy they will know just how lacklustre it is compared to the others.
its a shame that for a film that should have been a major highlight of the summer,its just another in a line of films to get through.
Indy might have battled russians, nazis,nasty indian folks,but theres 2 big hitters out there to come,The Dark Knight & Hellboy 2,both look to have the re-sit value, Indy doesnt have.
I had quite low expectations of this film,so let me get this out of the way,its not all bad and its quite fun in places,but and its a big But,this is what happens when you put two guys together who can both direct and produce,at the helm of a sequel,that its a case of damned if you do! damned if you dont,come up with the goods so to speak.
So lets be honest they are not breaking new ground,other films have tapped the vein of indy too much,with all thats gone before,this film really is two guys playing safe,making a movie that they know is going to make money,but also they must have known it was underpar compared to the others that have been previous.
its lost its sparkle somewhere,the quick fire sense of humour is missing,the worthy adversary has gone,the fight scenes with the evil baddies dont seem so evil.
it has it winks & nods to the past films,but has none of the risktaking that those films had,even with the last crusade,there was a sense of fun with tongue in cheek,with raiders and temple of doom it was saturday morning adventure serial time,which is its appeal to young and old alike.
but with the thrills of raiders and temple there was a dark side, the horror side coming through thats done in a way to scare rather than shock, that was missing in IJ&KOTCS.
They could have done a nod to the naked jungle and had the ants devour the soldiers,stripping them clean before our eyes,and the ending wasnt quite as spectacular as it could have been.
if this is a childs first experience of indy with their parents,then they wont really think anything more of it,compared to all the effects laden films in the 9-10 years since the last crusade,but if its some one in their 30s or older who grew up with indy they will know just how lacklustre it is compared to the others.
its a shame that for a film that should have been a major highlight of the summer,its just another in a line of films to get through.
Indy might have battled russians, nazis,nasty indian folks,but theres 2 big hitters out there to come,The Dark Knight & Hellboy 2,both look to have the re-sit value, Indy doesnt have.
"Time To Nut Up Or Shut Up"
-
- Walking Dead
- Posts: 78
- Joined: Fri Mar 28, 2008 3:02 pm
- Location: Surbiton...nothing like the "good life"!!!!
Grindhouse I couldnt have put that better myself (mine would have had more swearing in it lol!)Grindhouse wrote:Indiana jones & the kingdom of the crystal skull.
I had quite low expectations of this film,so let me get this out of the way,its not all bad and its quite fun in places,but and its a big But,this is what happens when you put two guys together who can both direct and produce,at the helm of a sequel,that its a case of damned if you do! damned if you dont,come up with the goods so to speak.
So lets be honest they are not breaking new ground,other films have tapped the vein of indy too much,with all thats gone before,this film really is two guys playing safe,making a movie that they know is going to make money,but also they must have known it was underpar compared to the others that have been previous.
its lost its sparkle somewhere,the quick fire sense of humour is missing,the worthy adversary has gone,the fight scenes with the evil baddies dont seem so evil.
it has it winks & nods to the past films,but has none of the risktaking that those films had,even with the last crusade,there was a sense of fun with tongue in cheek,with raiders and temple of doom it was saturday morning adventure serial time,which is its appeal to young and old alike.
but with the thrills of raiders and temple there was a dark side, the horror side coming through thats done in a way to scare rather than shock, that was missing in IJ&KOTCS.
They could have done a nod to the naked jungle and had the ants devour the soldiers,stripping them clean before our eyes,and the ending wasnt quite as spectacular as it could have been.
if this is a childs first experience of indy with their parents,then they wont really think anything more of it,compared to all the effects laden films in the 9-10 years since the last crusade,but if its some one in their 30s or older who grew up with indy they will know just how lacklustre it is compared to the others.
its a shame that for a film that should have been a major highlight of the summer,its just another in a line of films to get through.
Indy might have battled russians, nazis,nasty indian folks,but theres 2 big hitters out there to come,The Dark Knight & Hellboy 2,both look to have the re-sit value, Indy doesnt have.
I know you gentlemen have been through a lot, but when you find the time, I'd rather not spend the rest of this winter TIED TO THIS FUCKING COUCH!
-
- Undead Horde
- Posts: 425
- Joined: Sun Apr 02, 2006 7:01 pm
Grindhouse wrote:but theres 2 big hitters out there to come,The Dark Knight & Hellboy 2,both look to have the re-sit value, Indy doesnt have.
Don't forget Hulk 2, that looks good. Though any of this year's summer films will have a hell of a job being better than the brilliant Iron Man.
Bring her to me, you bum. I'll take care of business.