I'm not sure how many of the board members read my column today (and if you haven't I highly recommend you do before continuing) but in the spirit of what I wrote there, I am starting a recommendation topic.
BUT anyone who even mentions one of the gazillion movies that are now well acknowledged by the public will be shot.
To clarify:
THESE ARE THE RULES THAT I AM SETTING. If you don't like them, please just post your recommendation elsewhere. Don't read. Don't bother. This has a specific purpose. And if it sounds a bit choosy and elitist - it is. I am channelling our focus onto one particular place.
1) If it was made in USA and after 2000 - don't bother.
2) If it has over 1000 votes on IMDB, don't bother.
3) If it has won an Oscar, don't bother.
4) If it stars a major, major Hollywood star DURING their glory days, don't bother.
5) If it does not have some amazing, standout quality that you can specifically mention, DON'T BLOODY BOTHER.
However;
1) If it's foreign , espc. from one of the many countries whom we never mention, do bother.
2) If it has cinematic excellence despite budget and resource limitations, do bother.
3) If the acting is uniformly excellent by a cast of unknowns or has-beens, do bother.
4) If it never got a proper release, do bother.
5) If it makes you go giddy with excitement each time you watch it even though you have never found a single person to discuss let alone share the experience with, DO BOTHER TO MENTION THE FILM.
I'll start the ball rolling. 2007. South Korea. Gidam. Here's why: For resurrecting the almost dead anthology format and whilst doing so reminding me and any other viewer that real horror lies not only in ghots and ghouls but in our inability as human beings to cope with very real factors.
As well as showing how beautifully melancholy loneliness can be.
I will post one every day until someone else picks up the mantle and starts posting.
Rise up, people! You have nothing to lose but the shackles of populist cinema!
Sincerely yours
Voorheves
