A Night In The Woods

Pick at the bones of 2011's films
itchysore
Twitching Corpse
Twitching Corpse
Posts: 38
Joined: Tue Aug 29, 2006 5:19 pm

Re: A Night In The Woods

Post by itchysore »

I hate to truly diss any film but this was just terrible.

If you are going to copy Blair witch 10 years after the fact, at least bring something new to the table.

It had a good location and a game cast who turned in believable performances but the story was utter rubbish.

They cheated on the realism vibe by having huge sound effects for every jump moment and what were those big white lights in the campsite ?

I didn't buy for 1 second that the girl wouldn't have noticed someone standing 5 feet behind her while shes holding a torch nor the fact that when Mr beardy left the camp you could clearly see he had his backpack, so why was his laptop with incriminating evidence left in the tent ?

They didn't even keep to their own half hearted mythology as the hanging bloke was hung by his feet ? You hardly need a hangman's noose for that...

Bottom line, if your going to make me endure loads of horrible wobbly cam in the woods footage, for gods sake deliver with at least 1 genuine scare or creepy moment.

The only reason i can imagine the no review ban is they don't want their "cash in" exposed as there was nothing in the films story to give away or spoil.
daveroughcut
Running Zombie
Running Zombie
Posts: 240
Joined: Wed Jan 21, 2009 5:34 am

A Night In The Woods

Post by daveroughcut »

Canon 5D do not record sound. They can only record about 16 minutes of footage per card. The battery lasts about an hour. It had no night vision. That was not night vision tahr was black and white. Hate it.
bnny666
Fresh Meat
Fresh Meat
Posts: 6
Joined: Sun Jul 03, 2011 11:22 am
Location: Metropolis Plymouthia

Re: A Night In The Woods

Post by bnny666 »

We live not far from Wistman's Woods and despite his criticism of the film, my suggestion to dnky666 that we go camping there when we get back from FF was met with some opposition, so he must have been a bit spooked! :lol:
"Look at your reflection in the mirror. You're a creature of the night Michael, just like out of a comic book! You're a vampire Michael! My own brother, a goddamn, shit-sucking vampire. You wait 'till mom finds out, buddy!"

t: @moomin_sez
User avatar
Stephen with ph
Running Zombie
Running Zombie
Posts: 111
Joined: Tue Aug 26, 2008 6:48 pm
Location: The garden of England

Re: A Night In The Woods

Post by Stephen with ph »

maxmum wrote:Gosh, some harsh comments on this one. These films always shit me up when done properly. I am constantly just waiting for something to come out of the dark!

I also liked blair witch and thought this one was just as well done, with a slightly more interesting back story to the characters.
Agreed.

The only thing I ever enjoyed about Blair Witch was its inventiveness - there was nothing in its plot to engage or excite, and the characterisation was non-existent.

Yes, this movie is founded on exactly the same principles - but, to my mind, this movie has refined the form. And, more importantly, it's taken the trouble to work on characterisation.

I enjoyed it immensely. Other opinions are, of course, available.
Scrof the Return
Walking Dead
Walking Dead
Posts: 64
Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 12:29 pm
Location: Sheffield

Re: A Night In The Woods

Post by Scrof the Return »

What a shame they couldn't show Guinea Pigs or that I decided not to go to the Disco Screen instead that morning.
This was a tiresome, massively unoriginal, load of pants.
Wolfshade
Undead Horde
Undead Horde
Posts: 356
Joined: Wed Sep 10, 2008 2:57 pm

Re: A Night In The Woods

Post by Wolfshade »

When a film got cancelled in 2009, they bumped up Black to the main screen, and I think it would have been better if they'd done the same here, and bumped Rabies, Kidnapped or Midnight Son up to the main screen, and put this in the Discovery screen. It's nice to see indie UK films sometimes, but at least try to be remotedly original.
streetrw
Frightfest Hardcore
Frightfest Hardcore
Posts: 1560
Joined: Sun Mar 27, 2005 5:54 pm
Location: A hell of my own making
Contact:

Re: A Night In The Woods

Post by streetrw »

Wolfshade wrote:When a film got cancelled in 2009, they bumped up Black to the main screen, and I think it would have been better if they'd done the same here, and bumped Rabies, Kidnapped or Midnight Son up to the main screen, and put this in the Discovery screen. It's nice to see indie UK films sometimes, but at least try to be remotedly original.
Probably not Midnight Son - firstly it's awful, and secondly the picture definition was pretty poor on the Screen 4. Blown up to Empire 1's screen it would have been unwatchable.
http://streetrw.blogspot.com - For all your occasional film rambling needs.
http://twitter.com/streetrw - For when you really need to know what I had for breakfast.

AND NOW: SKYPE!
jonbly
Braaaains!
Braaaains!
Posts: 647
Joined: Tue Jul 18, 2006 12:16 pm
Location: Bristol

Re: A Night In The Woods

Post by jonbly »

daveroughcut wrote:It had no night vision.
It was probably supposed to be an infra-red adapted model. But then, that's normally a one-way adaption... and there was clearly a 'light' source being used (but there wasn't one mounted on the camera). At least picking apart the mistakes with those scenes added some interest...
User avatar
zappa fan
Frightfest Hardcore
Frightfest Hardcore
Posts: 1257
Joined: Thu Jun 16, 2005 3:21 pm
Location: Sunny Caerphilly (133.4 Miles West of Fright Fest)
Contact:

Re: A Night In The Woods

Post by zappa fan »

Currently on FreeVee
LAST FILM- Turistas 2006
"It's always funny until someone gets hurt. Then it's just hilarious." - Bill Hicks

twitter @nottsey
Letterboxd nottsey
Instagram nottsey
Post Reply